TetraMesa

  • About Us
  • Services
  • Clients
  • Contact
  • Blog

Digital Dollars, Real Debt: Hidden Connections Between Stablecoins, Treasuries, and Banks

October 23, 2026 By Scott

As a non-finance person who’s done work in crypto, I’ve come across something I think worth sharing from a product perspective. Part of what we do as product managers is look around corners. We can’t help it. We try to understand what happens when systems interact, dependencies change, and something in one place creates unintended consequences elsewhere. One thing we learn is that optimizing one part of a system doesn’t necessarily optimize the whole thing. In fact, sometimes making one aspect tremendously successful can create unintended consequences elsewhere. That’s especially interesting when the products themselves start becoming part of critical infrastructure. And that’s what’s increasingly happening with stablecoins.

What interests me here is there are three worlds that don’t seem to get discussed together in general business or product management circles. These are: government fiscal policy, traditional banking, and digital assets. There’s increasing attention in specialized finance research. But I suspect most general businesspeople and even product folks working in the space don’t necessarily encounter this info. And there’s dependencies emerging that I don’t think get enough attention.

Most people still think of stablecoins as “crypto stuff” and U.S. debt as “government economics or politics.” But what happens when growing worldwide demand for digital dollars also creates demand for U.S. government debt? And what happens when that same process shifts funding away from traditional banks or creates new channels through which financial stress can spread? That’s what I want to explore. Not as a prediction of an impending crisis, but as a series of connections that I think deserve more attention, especially among those who create products or services in this area. So I’m going to try to untangle this.

What prompted me to write this was this post from famed investor Ray Dalio called The Numbers Behind the Bond Bear Market. Some aspects may be disturbing. This article might be as well. Personally, I’m an optimist. However, some of what I’m going to present suggests some potential storm clouds. Maybe not. Either way, it’s worth understanding the connections to have a sense of which way things can lean as we see trends in one place put pressure in other areas. In any case, here we go.

[Read more…]

Filed Under: Crypto, Tech / Business / General

The Tokenization Taxonomy: A Practical Map of Assets, Rights, Services, and Credentials

July 24, 2026 By Scott

A multidimensional guide to what is being tokenized, what rights holders receive, which record controls, where the supporting information comes from, and what changes with tokenization.

In the individual series of work about Real World Assets (RWA) that led to this, one part developed a more detailed taxonomy of the kinds of oracle data an asset may require, while others examined the people, incentives, controls, and failure modes surrounding those records. Those remain companion frameworks rather than branches of the hierarchy presented in this final wrap-up.

This will be an extensive long-form article bringing together a central classification framework. The underlying asset, service, right, or credential forms the primary taxonomy. The token-holder’s rights, the authoritative record, the provenance of supporting information, and the changes introduced by tokenization operate as separate dimensions across that hierarchy.

Want to skip this entire article? Then here it is in a sentence: “Buying a token does not mean you own the underlying asset; it means you own whatever contractual rights the issuer’s legal jurisdiction enforces.”

That’s really it. If you want all the details, or at least as much as I’ve been able to get together, then continue…

I’ve used GPTs to help generate the graphics, and they’ve come out fairly well, but may require a click to enlarge them in some cases. (Or right-click and enlarge in a new window.) If you want, you can use them to just skim and pick up the basic ideas here without having to read through everything.

[Read more…]

Filed Under: Crypto

RWA, Meet RWL, Part 6: The Token Is Not the Thing

July 24, 2026 By Scott

Part 6 of 6 in “Real World Assets (RWA), Meet Real World Lies (RWL): Knowing What You Own in the Tokenized World,” a series about what tokenized assets represent, how information about them reaches the blockchain, and why none of this eliminates the need for trust.

The earlier parts of this series examined the underlying assets, the data that describes them, the people and institutions involved, and the failure modes that persist even when records are on-chain. This final part brings those threads together and offers a practical test.

The token is only one layer in a larger arrangement. The token is not the thing.

[Read more…]

Filed Under: Crypto

RWA, Meet RWL, Part 5: When the Asset Is Already Digital

July 24, 2026 By Scott

Part 5 of 6 in “Real World Assets (RWA), Meet Real World Lies (RWL): Knowing What You Own in the Tokenized World,” a series about what tokenized assets represent, how information about them reaches the blockchain, and why none of this eliminates the need for trust.

Parts 2–4 examined the data, the people, and the failure modes surrounding tokenized assets. We now return to the taxonomy itself. The original split between intangible legal claims and tangible physical assets works for most conventional RWAs. It does not cover the growing set of things that are digital from the start; data, compute, software, network rights, game objects, and credentials. Some of these are assets, some are services or licenses; some may not be assets at all. We need a third branch.

[Read more…]

Filed Under: Crypto

RWA, Meet RWL, Part 4: No Blockchain Solution Fixes Real-World Lies

July 24, 2026 By Scott

Part 4 of 6 in “Real World Assets (RWA), Meet Real World Lies (RWL): Knowing What You Own in the Tokenized World,” a series about what tokenized assets represent, how information about them reaches the blockchain, and why none of this eliminates the need for trust.

The first three parts looked at the assets, the data, and the people involved.

Part 1 asked what kind of thing was being tokenized and what claim the token actually gave its holder. Part 2 looked at the information required to describe and evaluate that thing. Part 3 examined the people and institutions responsible for reporting, checking, and acting on the information.

This part looks at what happens when those trust structures fail.

[Read more…]

Filed Under: Crypto

RWA, Meet RWL, Part 3: Permissionless Does Not Mean Trust-Free

July 24, 2026 By Scott

Part 3 of 6 in “Real World Assets (RWA), Meet Real World Lies (RWL): Knowing What You Own in the Tokenized World,” a series about what tokenized assets represent, how information about them reaches the blockchain, and why none of this eliminates the need for trust.

Parts 1 and 2 examined the underlying assets and the data used to describe them. Now we turn to the people and institutions responsible for that information.

Before getting into that, it’s worth clearing up two terms that tend to get used somewhat loosely.

[Read more…]

Filed Under: Crypto

RWA, Meet RWL, Part 2: The Oracle Problem

July 24, 2026 By Scott

Part 2 of 6 in “Real World Assets (RWA), Meet Real World Lies (RWL): Knowing What You Own in the Tokenized World,” a series about what tokenized assets represent, how information about them reaches the blockchain, and why none of this eliminates the need for trust.

Part 1 asked what kind of thing is being tokenized. Once we know that, we still need information about it: how much gold is in the vault, who owns the building, whether the aircraft was inspected, whether the borrower is paying. That is where the oracle problem begins.

[Read more…]

Filed Under: Crypto

RWA, Meet RWL, Part 1: “Real-World Asset” Is Not an Asset Class

July 24, 2026 By Scott

Part 1 of 6 in “Real World Assets (RWA), Meet Real World Lies (RWL): Knowing What You Own in the Tokenized World,” a series about what tokenized assets represent, how information about them reaches the blockchain, and why none of this eliminates the need for trust.

RWL is what I’m calling “Real-World Lies.” That might seem a little strong. Maybe it is. But I don’t necessarily mean “lies” only in the malicious sense. There are also mistakes, omissions, outdated records, stretched definitions, poorly understood rights, and information distorted by incentives. Right now, there seem to be plenty of ways for something that isn’t quite true to enter a system, become tacitly accepted, and continue moving through it as though it were fact. This series looks at how that happens, at least somewhat. But more importantly, how to classify and evaluate the many parts that finally seem to be coming together to bring more tokenized assets to market.

Much of the following is not new. If you’re already deeply familiar with tokenized assets, you may want to skip this entire series. However, if you’re still new to Real World Asset and trying to get a sense of the whole big picture, perhaps this series will help. It was created as part of a project to help some new to the area to build a wide scope taxonomy of the space and the issues across types of things involved. This isn’t about mechanisms of tokenization. We’ll be more focused on compare and contrast with real world assets and building an evaluation framework that helps us navigate these spaces.

[Read more…]

Filed Under: Crypto

Part 2: Stablecoins Aren’t All Stable the Same Way

June 10, 2026 By Scott

In Part 1, we discussed the many dollar-like claims of stablecoins. That matters because once we stop treating “stablecoin” as one single thing, the more important questions come into focus. What kind of claim is it? Who issued it? What backs it? Can it be redeemed? Does it pay yield? Who gets the float, and more.

So Part 1 was about the mental model: stablecoins as dollar-like claims. Now it’s time to go over why those claims are not all stable in the same way.

[Read more…]

Filed Under: Crypto, Uncategorized

Part 1: Stablecoin Flavors – What Are You Holding?

June 10, 2026 By Scott

Stablecoins are moving what we call Crypto more towards just “this is just Digital Money now.”

This two-part article series examines the current landscape of various “stablecoins” to clarify labels that often sound functionally descriptive but frequently aren’t. It also highlights under-discussed aspects in this evolving space. We need clearer understanding of what these assets are and as importantly, what they’re not. Even with the GENIUS Act and ongoing work on the CLARITY Act, significant ambiguity remains for some token types.

Stablecoins are not one thing. They’re a family of tokens with dollar-like claims, and the important questions aren’t whether they appear stable, but what kind of claim they represent, what backs them, who gets the yield, how they redeem, and what happens under stress.

Along the way, I’ll go into some of the oddities and implications of stablecoins. Some may seem slightly off topic. However, they’re all part of what’s becoming this ecosystem and therefore I believe useful in understanding how things fit together.

[Read more…]

Filed Under: Crypto, Tech / Business / General

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Next Page »

Recent Posts

  • Digital Dollars, Real Debt: Hidden Connections Between Stablecoins, Treasuries, and Banks
  • Human-in-the-Loop, But Not in Control
  • Pricing and Why “Unlimited” Digital Offers Are Generally Bad
  • Product Leader Workflow API Literacy: n8n
  • The API Bill Is a Product & Finance Decision

Categories

  • Analytics
  • Book Review
  • Crypto
  • Marketing
  • Product Management
  • Tech / Business / General
  • Travel
  • UI / UX
  • Uncategorized

Location

We're located in Stamford, CT, "The City that Works." Most of our in person engagement Clients are located in the metro NYC area in either New York City, Westchester or Fairfield Counties, as well as Los Angeles and San Francisco. We do off site work for a variety of Clients as well.

Have a Project?

If you have a project you would like to discuss, just get in touch via our Contact Form.

Connect

As a small consultancy, we spend more time with our Clients' social media than our own. If you would like to keep up with us the rare times we have something important enough to say via social media, feel free to follow our accounts.
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2026 · TetraMesa, LLC · All Rights Reserved